Digital
divide can shift Liberia's future in a negative way
Monday,
December 24, 2007
By Bernard Gbayee Goah
Electronically
communicated information should always be
checked thoroughly before reaching any
conclusion regarding an allegation against
anybody. E-mails,
websites, video and tape recordings, etc, must
be properly examined by the Liberian government
or any government before any conclusion can be
made on critical issues such as charging a
citizen with treason.
There are many
ways to authenticate electronic information such
as websites and e-mail communications, however
discussing these ways is not the subject of this
commentary, because
I don't want the criminal to become
smarter than law enforcement. Since the
criminals are also reading online comments, I am
afraid the wrong person might use this to
improve himself and run from justice.
In my view, some
individuals will criticize certain people due to
their alleged past involvements in the Liberian
civil war. One perfect example is the coup plot
allegation against Julu, Koukou, and others.
Without proper investigation, the Liberian
government used an e-mail communication from Tom
Woewiyu, and videotape recordings from other
sources to arrest General Julu and others for
their alleged involvement in subversive
activities against the government of President
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.
Some of my
friends on the other side of the isle, without
investigating further began to refer to Julu and
those arrested with him as "devils,"
and "criminals" and other names
associated with evil. Now that the government is
unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt the
guilt of General Julu and others, everyone has
stopped calling the General names. Up to now
there is no credible evidence to prove the guilt
of these individuals. Yet, General Julu and his
alleged co-conspirators are still in
prison in Liberia
, all in the name of "indisputable
evidence," supposedly amassed from e-mail
and video evidence, which could have been
manufactured.
Liberia
is a land where a handful of unqualified
individuals who claimed to be technologically
savvy are heading unmerited top positions in
government. There is a digital divide between
the power greedy people and the rest of the
Liberian citizenry. These quasi-technologists
are doing everything possible to restrict the
freedom of expression that Liberians should be
able to exercise, and are using such
technologies in their witch hunt for perceived
enemies. These individuals are taking advantage
of the Liberian people who do not have access to
technology and how it works, and are unable to
challenge the governments actions in a court of
law, which is an infringement of their right to
fair trial.
There is a serious
digital divide in
Liberia
between the quasi-technologists in government
and the rest of the citizenry.
However, there will be no defense for
those who are not technologically savvy if an
allegation is brought against them based on
technology-based evidence. This is the kind of
Liberia
we should expect if policies are not reversed.
Many Liberians know they have
constitutional rights, but they do not know how
to defend those rights.
The way in which these rights apply to
their day to day lives seemed almost elusive due
to the limited access to policymakers,
technology and due process. Do you realize that
some people have never seen the Liberian
constitution, and have not seen a computer?
I know that
Liberia
will rise again some day, but when?
This will only occur when policymakers
begin making decisions that will benefit
Liberian citizens in its entirety, instead of a
select few.
