jj
 
 
Home
Commentaries
Letters to the Editors
 
 
 
 
Archive
Mission Statement
Liberian Links
     
US Links
Other Int'l Links
 

 

 

Editorial farce, The Perspective and Aloysius Toe  

(When the shoe is on the other foot)

Monday, November 20, 2006    

 

 

   By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

          

                       

 

     I remember the time when political activists in the United States took to the streets, or the time some of us wrote editorial columns to protest previous Liberian government's terrible records of corruption, malfeasance and human rights abuse.

     I am still protesting today to have a clean and open government, to halt corruption, to bring government to the people and for government to respond to the needs of the Liberian people.

 

                                               

                      Pres. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf                     Aloysius Toe  

 

           

     I am not writing against Presidents Samuel Kanyon Doe or Charles Taylor this time but against our newly minted president, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, whom I want to believe has not lived up to her billing and is in the position of disappointing a lot of people, because of her frequent flyer and absentee approach to governance and other issues that will define her legacy.

     She is not listening to her people and perhaps is not feeling their pain. She wants to be everything - Minister of Foreign Affairs, Trade Negotiator, Minister of Commerce, awards recipient, and is eager to travel wherever her name is mentioned as the first elected female president on the African continent while the entire country falls apart in her absence.

     It is not any surprise that some of us are in the forefront of trying to bring this president back to the reasons the Liberian people elected her in the first place – that is to quickly respond to their needs and improve their living conditions before their patience runs out.

     It is not a surprise, either, that some of us did what we did with passion when we publicly took on her dictatorial, corrupt and insensitive predecessors that told us one thing and did the opposite even when our lives and that of our relatives were constantly in danger.

     However, when those Liberian government couldn’t get the out-of-country activists to rein terror on them, the government turned its terror campaign on dissident Liberians at home in its quest to suppress them. And yes, those activists and journalists were terrorized and some exiled for doing what any decent and patriotic Liberian would do for his or her people.

     The current president, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, who was an opposition did her part, (which is well documented) by discrediting previous Liberian governments (the Doe and Taylor administrations) whose policies she disagrees with, and ran an effective international lobbying campaign to oust them.

     Whether Ms. Sirleaf benefited financially from her international opposition efforts is unknown, because she was never audited by the Liberian people to know from whom, where and how much she garnered in the many years she traveled worldwide to speak against those governments.

     It didn’t bother the opposition at the time to question who was financing Ellen’s political crusade, and did not bother to ask why was she constantly attacking Samuel Kanyon Doe and Charles Taylor, because they figured she was on their side as they were willing to dance with anyone who was seen as being on their side denouncing those corrupt and repressive regimes.

     I worked with George H. Nubo on the editorial staff of The Perspective when it was then a credible, unknown but struggling newspaper before it became a household name, and after it transitioned to the Web as a political news organ.

     As an original cast member of the Perspective, we dealt with all issues political as they presented themselves, and did not take sides by discrediting or attempting to discredit those whose politics we disagree with because we favored the occupant in the Executive Mansion.

     Our mission was democracy and accountability in Liberia, and pressuring the administration to be sensitive by addressing the plight of the Liberian people in a practical way.

     That unified front, I guess stems from the fact that we had a common enemy, the devil, Charles Taylor whom we wanted out of office dead or alive, and we did all we could to be heard and were effective through our newfound news outlet, The Perspective.

     One Peter Kieh Doe, then a paid public relations hatchet man for the Taylor administration who claimed to know me in New Kru Town attacked me in one of his monologues as a “chicken rogue,” who stole during my days there.

     Talking about the total lacked of ideas and reducing the issues to slander and falsely accusing the other side? That’s one.

    So when I received what seems to be an article e-mailed to me supposedly written by George Nubo, I sincerely though the piece was a continuation of the advocacy role we played that pushed The Perspective into the stratosphere when I was a member of the editorial group that built it to the success it once enjoyed over those years before the proliferation of Liberian political Web sites.

     However, I was disappointed once I read the article, “The Human Farce and the UNMIL Conspiracy,” and was even more disappointed by the attacks on Aloysius Toe, and was quickly reminded of Peter Kieh Doe, the guy who falsely accused me of stealing chicken, and who constantly wrote The Perspective those days by attacking its writers for holding Charles Taylor’s feet to the fire for his total lacked of leadership.

    I expected to read an exclusive and provocative piece in which Mr. Nubo attempts to hold his reader’s undivided attention by highlighting the profound differences between The Perspective and Aloysius Toe’s position on the issues, by showing where the human rights’ advocate is wrong in his criticism of President Sirleaf.

   Instead, I was faced with a diatribe that chronicles Toe’s perceived bad behavior and, according to Nubo, some “agents of the international community in justifying their continued presence in Liberia and getting rich at the expenses of Liberians.”

     Nubo also asserts: “Mr. Toe, a human rights defender, is therefore making money out of badmouthing the government, not to offer criticisms that Liberians and their leaders could use to improve things, but rather to criticize so that he can receive funding.”

     By going after Toe the way he did, Nubo dabbled into an excruciatingly familiar style in Liberian journalism by playing deaf and blind to presidential misdeeds in favor of undermining others to protect the administration and put money in the pockets of the journalists.

     And like most Liberian newsgroups, Nubo acted like a hired hand than an actual reporter – perhaps a paid mouthpiece for the administration when he attempts to discredit and publicly attack Aloysius Toe for finding the courage to take on President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.    

     Another excerpt (verbatim) found in a paragraph of Nubo’s piece:

     “Mr. Toe’s opinion, however, was not buried with the results of the 2005 presidential elections, judging from his activities since the election of this administration. He is bent on destroying the administration.”

      How is Toe trying to destroy the administration, I wonder? What is the crime for which Aloysius Toe was publicly charged and found guilty in the court of George Nubo and his “The Perspective?”

     Why go after Toe and not write a serious column that informs and educates the Liberian people about President Sirleaf and her administration, its many shortfalls like presidential arrogance, the government’s failure to find a lasting solution to the rice issue, the shooting death of SSS agent Emmanuel Williams by deputy Ashford Peal, during a shootout with director Chris Massaquoi still unresolved, judicial interference, the recent report of the absentee Governance Reform Commission’s members who presumably are not working in Liberia but are being paid monthly salaries of one thousand dollars, and many more?

     President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, I don’t want to believe was elected by the Liberian people to be insulated from criticism, as George Nubo and others in her camp want us to believe. Nubo and his friends cannot continue to intimidate others who dared criticize the president, or face their wrath of public insults and condescension.  

     Our job is never to allow our relationships with a sitting president (we like and admire) to cloud our advocacy roles, to question our judgment and undermine our credibility.

     Nubo’s piece exposed him for what he has become lately, and did not do The Perspective any justice.

    

    

     

    

      

    

    

 

 

 

     

    

    

                          

     

  

   

      

     

    

    

    

       

    

    

    

    

    

           

    

    

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

Home |  About Theliberiandialogue |  Contact Us
© 2002 Sungbeh Communications. All Rights Reserved