Home
Commentaries
Letters to the Editors
 
 
 
 
Archive
Mission Statement
Liberian Links
     
US Links
Other Int'l Links
 

 

 

The contemptuous duo     

Sunday, October  08, 2006    

 

 

   By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

            

              

 

     First, they were embraced by some in and outside of the Liberian media for what many thought was the courage they supposedly showed for their sudden outbursts, when they spoke about possible corruption in government but were later forced to apologize to their colleagues for what was never said.

     But the Dusty and Harry show was embarrassingly short-lived, and was seen not for the concerns raised by the individuals, but for the phoniness of the ‘messenger’s’ utterances and the alarm they raised, which did not resonate with the general public because of the lack of credibility of the individuals behind the comments.

 

                               

                        LPRC's Harry A. Greaves Jr.              Rep. Dusty Wolokollie

  

     Montserrado County Rep. Dusty Lawrence Wolokollie, and the Liberian Petroleum Refinery Corporation’s Managing Director Harry A. Greaves Jr., who are not new to controversies made headlines recently when the duo, at separate legislative gathering bloviated about corruption in the making, or corruption not in the making they didn’t really want to fully discuss for fear of incriminating others. 

     Wolokollie and Greaves did not behave as if they are politically smart enough to channel their suspicions the proper way, perhaps through the body that oversees official corruption, but later apologized because of outcries from lawmakers who claimed to have been offended by any hint of misconduct.

      At the heart of the matter is Mr. Greaves, who claimed in August that a member of the Senate allegedly solicited $50,000 as “cold water” or bribe from him for the passage of the 2006/2007 fiscal budget.

     Rep. Wolokollie, for his part threw his own bomb, and was quoted to have said that his colleagues are opposed to the ratification of a (possible oil contract) because “members want to extort money from the companies,” which is their motive for asking to meet with executives wanting to explore in Liberia. 

     I don’t know what kind of relationship Mr. Wolokollie have with his colleagues, because most lawmakers who are experienced and savvy politicians don’t just come out swinging recklessly in public by hinting and pointing fingers at his or her unnamed colleagues about official corruption that hasn’t happen.

    Lawmakers make deals; they negotiate and often reached compromises with their colleagues across the aisle to get a particular job done. When there is an issue about official corruption concerning their own, they often tend to work together to get to the bottom of the issue. And if there's any sign of corruption or other illegal activities that threatens national security or the image of the body the represents, they will work together to deal with that member under the laws of their respective chamber or under the laws of the land.

     If Mr. Wolokollie didn’t want to go that route and is serious about unearthing corruption in his chambers, and wanted to expose those he claimed wanted to extort money from foreign businesses, he should have joined the line of those claiming anonymity to expose corruption, and would not be an attention-seeking blowhard whose openly reckless insinuation undermines him and the legislative body he represents.

     By not revealing the name or names of his colleagues and the foreign business, Mr. Wolokollie left a cloud of suspicion over the heads of House members who must now work under that cloud, and are now wondering who among them is the target of Wolokolie’s scorn and what must be done to repair the damage.

    Rep. Wolokollie should have been subpoenaed under oath before a judge to reveal the name or names of his colleagues and the business in question.

    Failure to do so should have warranted his immediate imprisonment, not an apology and a threat of a six-month suspension.

     I don’t know why President Sirleaf appointed Harry A. Greaves Jr., Managing Director for such a strategic Liberian Refinery Petroleum reserve in the first place, after this man abruptly left the Gyude Bryant’s failed and corrupt interim government under a cloud of suspicion for alleged financial misappropriation.

     My only answer is: If you are a key supporter of Ms. Sirleaf and a political patron, no question would be asked about your previous life, because you would sail easily into a position of power and prestige in her government only to show your true colors later. This is the old way, isn’t it?

     Most members of the Liberian Legislature are corrupt. That we know. However, Mr. Greaves seems to have played into that negative sentiment by blackmailing, and showing his disdain for a branch of government that has oversight responsibilities over his agency.

     How did the issue about a Senator’s attempt to solicit such an amount from him come up, anyway? What is Mr. Greaves’ role when it comes to the national budget?

     If such a thing ever occurred, why didn’t Harry A. Greaves Jr., contact the proper law enforcement agency or authority to have the Senator or Senators put under surveillance until he or she is arrested, tried and imprisoned?

     Like Dusty Wolokollie who vowed never to apologize for his behavior when his colleagues cited him for those incriminating comments, Harry Greaves did not reveal any names and vowed never to apologize for his comments either, but later caved in under pressure from the power of the government, and “apologized to this House for the embarrassment my statement may have caused,” he said.

    Harry A. Greaves Jr., should have also been ordered to appear before a judge and subpoenaed under oath to reveal the name of the Senator or Senators that tried to get bribes from him. Failure to do so should have led Harry A. Greaves Jr., to jail, until he is man enough to do the right thing.

     However, the lawmakers demanded a verbal apology from him, but told him later that a verbal apology is not sufficient, but must also retract his statement and publish it in the daily newspapers for one week, which seems like the kind of punishment some of us got as kids at home or at school when we violated rules and regulations. Wolokollie and Greaves acted like kids with tantrum, and they were treated exactly like kids with temper tantrum.

      Wolokollie and Greaves are two gentlemen who worked very hard to effect democratic change in Liberia. Whether we agree or disagree with their politics and their dealings, we must acknowledge their roles in their previous lives.

     However, the individuals are also working very hard to put asterisks to their names for the way they go about conducting public policy. 

     Unfortunately, the duo will also be remembered for the controversies and scandals they continued to generate in their new lives.

     

 

      

    

 

    

         

 

                            

   

 

    

    

 

  

            

      

 

           

    

 

    

 

    

     

  

   

          

    

 

     

 

                            

    

                          

     

  

   

      

     

    

    

    

       

    

    

    

    

    

           

    

    

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

Home |  About Theliberiandialogue |  Contact Us
© 2002 Sungbeh Communications. All Rights Reserved