jj
 
 
Home
Commentaries
Letters to the Editors
 
 
 
 
Archive
Mission Statement
Liberian Links
     
US Links
Other Int'l Links
 

 

 

 What is Milton Teahjay saying about Matthews' death, diplomatic passport and the government of Liberia?

    

 Sunday, September 30, 2007  

 

 

       By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

              

                                                  

     I am hardly on the same side of the Johnson-Sirleaf administration on key issues, but caught myself agreeing with the administration first on the issue regarding Police Inspector General Beatrice Munah Sieh and the idea of sending her for sensitivity training, which I suggested in a 2006 column, and now am agreeing with the administration once again after the president pursued a policy of accountability regarding diplomatic passports.

     After all, it doesn’t take a genius to know the policy regarding the issuance and revocation of diplomatic passports; meaning only those currently working under the umbrella of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as diplomats, their families and staff members that are working overseas, and other very important local employees and their staffs who represents the nation in advancing its policies abroad, are entitled to diplomatic passports.

     I never once thought an ailing former Foreign Minister who was seeking medical treatment out of the country before his unfortunate death, or any living former Foreign Minister is entitled to a diplomatic passport because of the individual’s previous service to the nation.

     Even though he served his country as Foreign Minister in two administrations, before his death, Gabriel Baccus Matthews was a private citizen who was no longer working for government. If that’s the case, why should Gabriel Baccus Mathews be given special treatment, a diplomatic passport to seek medical treatment overseas?

                                              J. Milton Teahjay

            The late G. Baccus Matthews                            J. Milton Teahjay

 

     Like any private citizen who got sick and wants to travel abroad for medical treatment, Mr. Matthews should have accepted a regular passport to travel and get medical treatment abroad. If ordinary Liberians can travel abroad for medical treatment without diplomatic passports, former government officials can do the same. No special treatment, period.

     How can there be accountability in the passport system when officials in and out of government – not only Foreign Ministry officials and foreigners have access to both diplomatic and regular Liberian passports? The Liberian passport must be protected, because next to the Liberian flag is a symbol and national treasure of the country, and cannot continued to be abused by the criminal-minded and other Liberians.

     I remember vividly over the years and even today, because of the weak and ineffective passport policy of the past when foreigners from many (West) African countries, Lebanese and others bought and carried Liberian passports of convenience to have access to the United States and other countries worldwide. Liberians complained, understandably so about such practice especially when Liberian citizens have difficulty getting their own country’s passports to travel.

     However, the recent complaint made by J. Milton Teahjay, in the wake of Matthews’ death suggests such when he was quoted as saying that the government accorded commonplace treatment to the late political leader by giving him an ordinary passport.

     “When Mr. Matthews abruptly got ill Roseline Neufville, who was former chancellor of the UPP, took Mr. Matthews’ diplomatic passport to the Foreign Ministry to either get it renewed or to get a new diplomatic passport. The Foreign Ministry told Roseline Neufville that Mr. Matthews was no longer a Foreign Minister and was therefore not entitled to a diplomatic passport,” Teahjay reportedly said.

     After the government made a goodwill gesture and donated $15,000 to help cover the funeral cost of Mr. Matthews, Teahjay thanked the government but also made these remarks: “He (Matthews) never got help from the government during his period of sickness. He never got help from the government while he was alive.”

     “He tried getting help from the government but never got any help from the government. Had the US $15,000 been given to Mr. Matthews while he was alive, he would have been alive today. It would have done much to help him cover his funeral expenses,” Teahjay said again.

     J. Milton Teahjay is right about one thing. Any reasonable amount of money given to help an ailing person or one who is near death can help make a difference in a remarkable way.

     However, where Mr. Teahjay is dead wrong is when he thinks government is supposed to, is obligated or is in the business of providing diplomatic passports, funeral services and life support in the form of financial assistance to ailing former officials who wants to travel abroad for medical treatment.

     Even though the practice of government burying or providing financial and funeral assistance to help bury some of its former officials is nothing new in the Liberian society, let it be clear to all that government is not and should not be in the burial business. And if the Liberian government insists on such practice that favors its friends, the courtesy ought to be extended to all Liberians and not only the politically connected and powerful.

     However, a credible government-funded insurance program, or an insurance program funded by private businesses (if there are any in Liberia), should be encouraged to help in this process.

     The practice of government burying or providing funeral and financial assistance to the family or friends of a deceased person creates a class system; is unfair and discriminatory because it favors the politically connected and powerful, leaving out the poor with no stint in government and with no political connection to scramble for funds to bury their loved ones.

     Ellen Johnson Sirleaf fought passionately after she was inaugurated president by working tirelessly to monitor the issuance and retrieval of all (diplomatic) passports from former government officials and individuals who have no business having those passports. The strict passport policy is in the right direction and the right decision.

     Providing funeral and financial assistance to ailing and deceased government officials is a bad policy. If the Liberian government’s going to do it for one group, the courtesy should be extended to all Liberians.

     

     

    

    

  

     

    

    

    

      

      

   

   

             

     

   

   

 

    

    

        

    

     

 

 

 

            

    

           

    

    

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

Home |  About Theliberiandialogue |  Contact Us
© 2002 Sungbeh Communications. All Rights Reserved