Home
Commentaries
Letters to the Editors
 
 
 
 
Archive
Mission Statement
Liberian Links
     
US Links
Other Int'l Links
 

 

 

Pres. Sirleaf's leadership style mimics predecessors 
Sunday, August  26, 2006

   

 

 By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

     

               

     I really don't know whether I can win this public fight with Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and the Liberian people, but it is one I must pick to draw attention to something the president has been doing from the time she was sworn in as leader of Liberia.

     No, I am not writing again about the July 26, fire that gutted the 4th floor of the Executive Mansion, or the not so professional and fatal conduct of her presidential bodyguards or Special Security Service agents (SSS), which resulted in the death of agent Emmanuel "Silver J" Williams.

     It is about the president giving away tons of money, and bags of rice and other items to those she feels need it in a country where someone is always looking up to another person to give them something because of existing hardship.

     Knowing Liberians, I will be seen as just another rabid critic of President Sir leaf who don’t want to see peace in the country, but wants to bring the president down at a time she’s trying her best to bring development to the country and improve the

 lives of Liberians. 

                                                       

                                           

                                        Pres. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf

 

 

     Some will even go as far as saying such nonsense as “I don’t blame you, I blame Ellen for putting the Liberian people thing on her head,” when one attempts to discuss these very serious issues.

     These Liberians will never see the politics in the president’s actions since it is about humanity and money changing hands and going to those in need. And because the recipients are poor it might be seen as in bad taste for anyone to even say anything negative about the President of Liberia for doing exactly what others failed to do.

     But the presidency is not about charity. It is about leadership, inspiration and empowerment, and anything concerning philanthropic endeavors should be left to the experts and others in the field who must be empowered, and must have the support of the president and the citizens to get funding for existing organizations like the Red Cross and other humanitarian organizations, or fund new ones that will help Liberians in these critical times.

     President Sirleaf’s altruistic approach to governance is troubling, even as she glowed in the Tubman, Tolbert, Doe and Taylor-style of the politics of rice and money, and has revived the despicable paternalistic practices of her predecessors whom we watched helplessly in their days when they insulted us, took us for granted, bought us and exploited us in the name of helping us the poor and needy.

     Now it appears that President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf who’s supposed to take us away from the old to the modern (political) era wants to be this maternal figure that wants to look after her “children,” and has demonstrated over and over how she’s not far from duplicating the failed and arrogant policies of her predecessors.

     Where’s she getting the money, anyway? Is the money appropriated in the national budget for these philanthropic endeavors? If not, then why can’t the money be appropriated in the national budget to be distributed to humanitarian organizations to help Liberians? Is the money coming from her personal finances? Where’s accountability when we need it?

    It is worth mentioning that right after the inauguration, the president gave away money to selected counties as if she had just won the lottery.

    Recently, the president contributed $7,000 to the bereaved family of the deceased SSS agent, Emmanuel “Silver J” Williams.

     Again, the president of Liberia, not private citizen Ellen Johnson Sirleaf issued a $1,000 check to the ailing Journalist Throuble Suah’s fund; 100 bags of rice and 50 desk to the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs); 100 bags of rice and $200 to the flood victims in Margibi County, an unspecified purse to some “staff for the upkeep of the children at the orphanage,” and a donation to journalist Ignatius Roberts, who lost his house in a fire in New Kru Town.

     “In an attempt to identify with the people of the county following the elections,” the August 21 news bulletin from Star Radio reported that President Sirleaf donated $10,000 to the people of Margibi County, $5,000 for the county’s scholarship program, $3,000 went to District #2, and $2,000 was donated to development initiatives in the county.

     When will this madness end? And what if other individuals and counties want money from President Sirleaf? Is she prepared to give them their share of money also? Is this leadership or is she just trying to buy these people and counties in order to put them in her pocketbook?

     Certainly there’s room for this kind of philanthropic spirit the president has shown. The only thing: It’s all politics. And I wish prominent and private Liberian citizens and other private groups would wake up to the call and do what President Johnson-Sirleaf is doing.

     President Sirleaf could’ve used the presidential bully pulpit to rally her friends in the private sectors and Liberians at home and abroad to be generous and rise up to the occasion to help Liberians in need. She could have also secured private donations that could be turned over to another body – preferably a respected private organization to carry out the humanitarian needs of the Liberian people.

     However, as a political leader of the country and leader of her Unity Party, President Sirleaf put herself in the crossfire by playing politics when she knows very well what she’s doing seems right on the surface but is wrong politically.

     President Sirleaf resurrected the old political tricks of her predecessors by going into their playbooks when she addresses this very serious public policy issue by giving out personal financial contributions to individuals and group, which cheapens the process, incites loyalty and put her in the middle of the story.

     The president’s generosity corrupts the political process, and makes the people to feel a sense of indebtedness to her for helping them during their time of crisis. Her generosity, which resembles influence buying undermines democracy, and have the potential of keeping the citizens in check whenever they want to hold a very generous president accountable for not doing the right thing.

     President Sirleaf’s Unity Party will benefit from her generosity, and will also gave her party an unfair advantage over other financially strapped political parties that cannot compete with the Unity Party and a “rich” president who’s doling out money like it is falling from the trees behind the Executive Mansion.

    The Press Union of Liberia (PUL), publicly congratulated President Sirleaf the other day for her donation to journalist Throuble Suah’s medical funds. I am sure Mr. Suah appreciates the kind gesture, but is the behavior an appropriate one?

     Is the Press Union’s warm reception an example of the group being very careful not to bite the hand that feeds them?

     Where are the activists when we really need them?

      

 

 

              

    

                   

 

  

    

    

     

      

   


  


     

       

           

    

    

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                            

 

                                                               -

 

 

    

     

    

    

    

       

    

    

    

    

    

           

    

    

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

Home |  About Theliberiandialogue |  Contact Us
© 2002 Sungbeh Communications. All Rights Reserved