|
"Back
To The Soil": A Movement to Self-Sufficiency, Or Another Political Lip
Service To the Liberian People?
Wednesday,
July 01, 2009
By Nyankor Matthew
On Saturday, June 27, 2009, the
government of Liberia in collaboration with the United Nations officially
launched the “back to the soil movement”, which – if done right may be the
catalyst for radically revitalizing our dormant agriculture sector.
The importance of self-sufficiency in Liberia and the entire Afrikan
continent cannot be emphasized enough. Minister
Louis Farrakhan said it best during a speech to the citizens of Ghana, when he
said: “…as long as somebody else is
feeding you, you will never be free. If
somebody else is feeding us, if somebody else is clothing us, then we have not
taken our destiny in our own hands.”
The Liberian agriculture sector
is desperately in need of radical and progressive revitalization after years of
neglect due to the long and brutal UNCIVIL war.
In each of Liberia’s 15 counties, an average of 80 to 90 percent of the
population is engaged in farming related activities.
Subsistence farming is not only the main source of income for farmers, it
is also the main source of income for the majority of Liberians, as an estimated
75% of Liberians are engaged in farming related activities.
Increasing farmers’ income and purchasing power, and bringing them out
of subsistence farming would enable the country and the people to prosper, while
at the time increasing the country’s ability to earn and conserve foreign
exchange.
According to the county
development agenda, “…NGOs have increased their efforts to supply basic
inputs to farmers to jump-start the agricultural economy, but these efforts have
not reached all areas of the Counties. Poor road conditions have not been
supportive to the restoration of production capacities as rural areas remain
unreachable, particularly during the rainy season”.
The jingles are great and the fanfare to increase awareness and awaken
our consciousness to the significance of this issue is even better, but I am
still not confident that the underlying issues as to why the agriculture sector
is producing so little, is being adequately addressed by the newly launched
“back to the soil movement”.
A few years back, a well
planned and extensive countywide consultation exercise was undertaken by
Madam/President Johnson-Sirleaf administration in all fifteen counties between
September and December 2007. Citizens representing the various clans, towns,
districts and county government, along with Liberia’s development partners
identified the pressing needs and priority action areas to achieve sustained
development in these counties.
Within the agriculture sector,
farmers in the counties reported in large percentages that the major constraints
for them are the lack seeds to plant; the lack of tools to plant the seeds; and
lack of cash. The below evidence
clearly shows that the lack of seeds and tools are directly correlated to
limited to or no access to cash to farmers or those involved in farming related
activities. If a farmer does not
have cash the farmer is unable to purchase seeds or tools; and if a farmer does
not have seeds and tools, he/she is unable to be productive.
|
Counties
|
Lack
of seeds
|
Lack
of tools
|
Lack
of cash
|
|
BOMI
|
63%
|
45%
|
21%
|
|
RIVERGEE
|
47%
|
55%
|
21%
|
|
RIVERCESS
|
45%
|
60%
|
47%
|
|
NIMBA
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
MONTSERRADO
|
53%
|
59%
|
25%
|
|
MARYLAND
|
21%
|
39%
|
39%
|
|
MARGIBI
|
61%
|
50%
|
17%
|
|
LOFA
|
55%
|
59%
|
47%
|
|
GRAND KRU
|
64%
|
56%
|
2%
|
|
GRAND GEDEH
|
46%
|
42%
|
35%
|
|
GRAND CAPE MOUNT
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
GRAND BASSA
|
21%
|
39%
|
38%
|
|
GBARPOLU
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
BONG
|
46%
|
40%
|
30%
|
|
SINOE
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
*The
percentages were pulled from the County Development Agendas*
The gap between what is needed
and what is provided to farmers is still alarmingly disproportionate, as a
result many of our farmers are unable to farm or even provide for themselves in
other sectors. We should all, as
Liberians be ashamed to utter out loud that our farmers are relying on handouts
from NGOs for their survival. In
addition to a lack of financial and physical resources, non existent
infrastructure continues to be a major challenge to reviving the agriculture
sector, but for now the focus must be on getting farmers the necessary resources
to go back to the soil so that they are at least able to feed themselves before
feeding the rest of us.
I am encouraged to see that the
Department of Regional Development and Extension, a program within the Ministry
of Agriculture requested $100,000 for Tools and small equipment, and $265, 053
for Agricultural supplies and inputs for the 2009/2010 budget year.
This is an encouraging and positive step in the right direction; however
more still needs to be done. Although
the “back to the soil” movement is essential to long term food sufficiency
in Liberia, the process will remain a meaningless gimmick if it is not backed by
a commitment to provide the financial and/or physical capital needed to boost
production in the agriculture sector.
ACCESS
TO CREDIT AND
OTHER BANKING SERVICES
Lack of access to capital is a
major factor hampering agricultural development in Liberia, as evidence by the
table above. Most Liberians, especially those in the agriculture sector still
have little to no access to credit. Because a large percentage of Liberian
farmers and entrepreneurs have little to no access to modern banking services
many have been forced to turn to the informal sector to fill in the gap. In the
formal financial sector, the average lending rate is 14.3%, while the informal
sector-lending rate is estimated at an interest rate of around 25%, almost twice
the interest rate being offered in the formal sector.
Though commercial banks’
lending to the agriculture sector has improved since 2005, the country’s
banking sector still has long ways to go in coming up with innovative and
creative ways of extending credit to the agriculture sector.
According to the Central Bank’s financial statistics, as of April 2008,
commercial banks’ lending to the agriculture sector was only 4.1% of total
lending, while commercial banks’ lending to their personnel was twice the
amount at 14.9%. It is important to
note that lending in the agriculture sector has being on a downward trend. Lending to the agriculture sector has declined from a high of
11.9% in May of 2006, to the current April rate of 4.1%.
Limited to no access to credit represents a massive constraint to
agricultural growth for the nation. If
the agriculture sector is to become the backbone of the Liberian economy, more
needs to be done by the banking sector in extending credit to farmers.
Because the population does not have access to credit, there is very
little possibility that the agriculture sector will increase production a whole
lot more than what is currently being produced.
RECOMMENDATION
The government of Liberia, in
conjunction with the Central Bank, needs to encourage commercial banks to come
up with strategies to improve and increase lending to farmers and the
agriculture sector as a whole. If
the government is unable to accomplish this task, it must find some means for
providing subsidies to farmers.
A more radical recommendation
is to create an AGRICULTURE BANK with rural finance as the principal operational
area. The agriculture bank would
provide low interest long and short-term loans, business development services,
basic technology training for literate farmers, financial literacy classes, and
provide other services when the need arises.
CONCLUSION
Increasing access to low
interest, short and long-term loans will go a long way in minimizing the
challenges and hardships the average farmer in Liberia endures.
Once our farmers are able to feed themselves in the near future, we can
all only hope that large scale mechanized farming would be the next logical way
forward to long term food sufficiency in Liberia. In order to undertake such a
progressive agriculture campaign, the government in conjunction with the private
sector, specifically the banking sector, will need to become more committed in
terms of financial and non-financial capital investment in our agriculture
sector.
In spite of the constraints
faced by the agriculture sector, I am optimistic that if giving the necessary
tools, the Liberian agriculture sector, specifically the farming sector has the
potential to become a booming industry, and possibly the bread basket for the
MANO River States in the next two to three decades.
Ms. Nyankor Matthew
holds Bachelor’s degree in Political Science, with a specialization in Public
Administration, and a Master’s degree in Public and Environmental Affairs (MPA),
with a specialization in Public/Government Finance.
She can reached at Nyankorm@gmail.com
-
|