|
What's
Wrong With This Picture?
1
1940 - 11112008f- Two- Soccer Legends
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
 |
| Tewroh-Wehtoe
Sungbeh |
When
he accompanied President Ellen
Johnson Sirleaf to Atlanta,
Georgia in 2007, Information
Minister Laurence Bropleh did
what he thought was right for
his boss’ ears when she met
with the Liberian Association
of Metropolitan Atlanta
(LAMA), that day.
During the question and answer
period, Bropleh distributed
pieces of papers to the
audience in advance for
individuals to write down
whatever question they wanted
to ask the visiting president,
who perhaps would have gone
out of her way to either
explain or not explain to the
Liberian people her goals and
plans for the war-torn nation
she inherited from successive
interim leaders and
dictatorial administrations.
Surprisingly,
and right before our eyes and
after the questions were
written and given to the
Information Minister, Bropleh
gently sifted through the
questions then screened them
before reading to the
president one-by-one the ones
he thought were appropriate
for her attention.
During
that period of anxiety when
Liberians were doggedly
determined to ascertain
information about their
country and war-weary
relatives, Bropleh’s concern
was not about releasing
credible information but to
protect a president who lived
her entire political life
campaigning for
accountability, press freedom,
openness in government,
genuine democracy and the rule
of law.

Information Minister
Bropleh
However,
when an individual in the
audience asked whether it was
censorship, Jerry Mwagbe, who
assisted Bropleh at the podium
said: “This is not
censorship but about time,”
and that “the president had
a long day.”
Bropleh’s
behavior was an interesting
exercise that resembles
censorship, indeed, and an
attempt to protect the newly
elected president who did not
know what to expect from
Liberians living outside of
Liberia, who were happy to
meet with her but were also
concerned about the well being
of their relatives after the
protracted civil war that made
them beggars and homeless in
their own country.
Bropleh
is at it again, this time is
reportedly angry about the way
the media is publishing
“negative stories” about
the Liberian government;
believing such negative
stories about the government
could possibly drive away
potential investors who wants
to do business in Liberia.
According
to news reports out of
Liberia, Bropleh, who was
speaking during a press
conference wants the media to
write positive stories “that
will promote peace and build
the image of the country.”
A
desperate man, Bropleh also
believes he is doing his job
by trying to end the endless
negative stories about
corruption that continues to
take the wind out of a
government that came to power
with such political capital;
but saw it varnished after
President Sirleaf – the
“traveling president”
failed miserably to live up to
expectations three years after
she was inaugurated to the
highest political office of
the land.
“Although
there are some good
journalists in the country
that write stories of peace
and development, there are
also few that are in the
practice of assassinating
people’s character. I am
being embarrassed by many
Liberians at home and abroad
about the kind of stories
coming out of the Liberian
media,” Bropleh said.
This
is not the way to react when
one actually attempts to
solicit the cooperation of a
diverse group of men and women
at home and abroad, whose
agenda is not to intentionally
destroy the Liberian
government but to advocate
good governance, to get the
government to genuinely
address chronic unemployment
and poverty issues in the
country, and to also
investigate and prosecute
corruption happening day and
night on the president’s
watch.
But
how can the media make up or
write, (Bropleh’s words)
positive stories about the
government when there seems
not to be courage on the
president’s part to go after
her friends, to have a bold
vision and a coherent domestic
policy that tackles
unemployment (85 percent),
poverty and hunger in a
country where two-third of
Liberians live on less than $1
a day?
Instead of blaming or
pleading with journalists to
write positive stories about
the Johnson-Sirleaf
administration, Bropleh
obviously should advise the
president about changing her
governing style to reflect
sensitivity and compassion,
accountability and
transparency, respect and less
arrogance, and to address
those crucial bread and butter
issues that affects ordinary
Liberians at home.
President
Sirleaf cannot continue to be
loyal to her friends and
cronies at the expense of the
citizenry whenever they (her
cronies) violate the laws of
the land, or whenever a Harry
A. Greaves Jr., disrespects
the legislative branch of
government like he did
recently when he reportedly
said he is not “answerable
to the people and the
Representatives,” after that
body refused to go along with
his more than $28 million
unilateral investment signing
spree with a company known as
ZAKHEM International, but
expects positive stories from
journalists at home and
abroad?
However,
when the Liberian congress did
not go along with his twisted
criminal deal, Greaves sued
and then suddenly withdrew his
lawsuit barely 24 hours after
he filed it.
President Sirleaf
should have jumped all over
Harry A. Greaves Jr.,
immediately after hearing
about this mess and not wait
days and weeks to broadly
address the crisis of
corruption in her
administration at a press
conference. The press
conference did not help the
president’s image at home
because the personal and
political damage has already
been done to a president and
government that appears to be
overwhelmed, paralyzed and
drowning in incompetence.
How
can a distraction like this, a
public relations mess; an
obvious poor judgment on the
part of Greaves, who already
is a very unpopular figure and
a negative influence in that
government warrant positive
spin from journalists? What is
the purpose of writing
positive stories, anyway?
After all, good policies and
good attitude will attract
positive stories, as such,
Bropleh didn’t have to
complain or feel embarrassed
that journalists failed to
carry positive stories about
the Johnson-Sirleaf
administration. The
administration wrote the bad
stories by their own actions,
and the journalist just
carried those bad stories.
In
his report to the Security
Council on the United Nations
Mission in Liberia (UNMIL),
calling for international
partners to continue to
support Liberia,
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
said: “Since last August,
Liberia has continued to make
“steady progress” towards
achieving its four-pronged
poverty reduction strategy
which focuses on security,
economy recovery, rule of law
and infrastructure and basic
services.”
I
don’t know which Liberia
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
is referring to that made
“steady progress” towards
achieving the poverty
reduction strategy.
Is
the Secretary General talking
about the same Liberia I know
– the Liberia where phone
calls originate daily and
weekly telling/demanding me
and other Liberians abroad to
send money because a relative,
friend or neighbor is going
hungry and cannot afford to
buy a cup of rice, cannot
afford to pay the month’s
rent, his or her kid cannot
continue to go to school
because of the obvious lack of
school fees, university
students cannot afford to
enroll because of the high
cost of education; a country
where Liberians are dying
constantly of diabetes, high
blood pressure and other
preventable diseases, or a
Liberia where armed gangsters
and criminals roamed daily
prying on innocent Liberians?
If
“steady progress” is a
code word meant to calm down
our fears and give the
Liberian people hope, the
steady progress the
Secretary-General sees and
whatever aid money that comes
into the country from friendly
donor countries is not
trickling down to ordinary
Liberians, who are finding it
extremely difficult to survive
in Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s
Liberia.
This
is not “steady progress.”
It is called suffering.
|