On
Friday April 17, Judge James Zotaa of Criminal Court “A” angrily proclaimed
in open court that the Ministry of Health (MOH) illegally removed 35 children
from the Adoption Home of WACSN – the West African Children Support Network in
Sinkor on March 26, 2009, without a court order and placed them in the Don Bosco
Home for street children in Chocolate City, Gardnerville.
This
action by the MOH upon the WACSN children was reckless and a blatant violation
of their human rights. The Ministry of Justice needs to be more concern with the
basic human rights of the Liberian Child. The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) must see
the necessity to shift the working paradigm from one of criminal sanction on the
providers to that of human rights promotion of the children.
The
Ministries of Health and Justice, and the private adoption agency WACSN were
brought into court by the Independent Human Rights activist Melvin Page under a
writ of Habeas Corpus to answer questions as to the whereabouts of 3 children
illegally snatched by the MOH from the care of WACSN. The 3 children were the
Kerkula boys who were among the 35 children unlawfully removed by the MOH from
the WACSN compound in Sinkor. Due to the forceful and unlawful manner in which
the children were removed, the MOH had no mechanism in place to determine the
names of children, their medical history, and levels of social, psychological
and behavioral competence and performance. In short, the MOH did not and still
does not know the children which they illegally removed from WACSN’s care.
WACSN
is rightfully claiming that the 35 children in its care that the MOH illegally
removed and took to the Don Bosco Home were relinquished by their parents for
the sole purpose of adoption. The agency maintains that it is not an orphanage,
and the children in its care did not come from any orphanage and do not know
urban life, as they come from homes with parents, authority and Christian
upbringing. Many of these children came from rural and semi-rural settings and
do not know the city lifestyles of street children which Don Bosco primarily
cares for. The WACSN children are not street children. They came from a
well-managed WACSN home, entrusted by their parents, cared for by professional
home 'mothers' in a home setting that provided them love, caring, food, clothes,
shelter, education, religion, and healthcare services. Consequently, placing a
person who has learned to survive by victimizing others and becoming a criminal,
no matter the tender age, with children that are innocent and protected has
certain disadvantages.
Don
Bosco Home does not provide the necessary protection, security, treatment and
care for the WACSN children. A policy reversal is needed for the sake of parents
who do not understand the politics and power play of Monrovia and the pettiness
of bureaucrats who are determined to advance their careers on the backs of
innocent children. In reviewing the services of Don Bosco, this author finds
that WACSN is correct. The Don Bosco Home does no more than what WACSN does. In
fact, this author finds that the Don Bosco Home is a bad fit for the WACSN
Children. The Director of WACSN’s Adoption Program, Mrs. Willette Urey said
recently, that our children are our most valuable resource and most vulnerable
citizens. Hence, the Ministry of Health cannot in good faith place our children
in a ramshackle, dilapidated, shabby place just because it says it is being run
by Don Bosco. Our children are sleeping on mats on the floor at Don Bosco. Mrs.
Urey angrily says, this action by the MOH is not fair. It is not right. She
wonders why Joseph Geebro, Lydia Sherman and Eva Morgan are playing politics
with the lives of innocent children.
According
to the Don Bosco website, the organization only service
children who live on the streets of Monrovia. These children are deprived of
family care and protection, many between the ages of about 5 and 17 years old.
Their population includes children who might not necessarily be homeless
or without families, but who live in situations where there is no protection,
supervision, or direction from responsible adults. Many of the street children
in Don Bosco’s care, while living on the streets were engaged in contracts to
fetch water or wash dishes and carry loads at a short distance for people for
money, whereas others simply stole to earn a living, or to eat one square meal a
day. When these children are not in the care of Don Bosco, they sleep in
unfinished buildings, market stalls, abandon cars, soccer pitches and just any
available place they can find regardless their safety, they are largely
self-supervised.
The
Don Bosco children’s home website further states that the negative impact of
street life on children in Liberia is enormous. Accordingly, many street
children in Don Bosco’s care lack basic rights such as education, family love,
health care, good food & safety. Other disadvantages include exposure to
drugs, the risk of being knocked down by uninsured cars, harsh punishment for
little offences. Also, these conditions and behavior brings early arrival of
adulthood, association with the wrong people & criminals and a loss of
family ties. Another big problem with children at the Don Bosco Children Home is
that they have been exploited by adults who hire them to work but often do not
paid them for the work they do.
The
Don Bosco website further states that, these children allegedly face more
attacks and abuses from law enforcers than they face from civilians. As such,
protection/advocacy groups determinately engage law enforcers in a dialogue to
try and establish a working relationship with them to care for these vulnerable
children. In past years, it has been WACSN, who provided food and medical supply
to street children, ex-combatants and war-affected youths. Madame Diana Davis,
former president of the union of orphanages in Liberia said, it has always been
WACSN who have come to the aid of orphanages and street children by supplying
critically needed food, clothing and medical supply for children. Over the past
11 years, it has been WACSN who we all turn to for assistance.
There
are about 95 registered orphanages with many informal group homes caring for
Liberia’s over 60,000 homeless, abandoned, and orphaned children. Orphanages
are usually under funded receiving erratic government funding of about US$4.00
per orphan per month; thereby, relying primarily on private donations.
Orphanages throughout Liberia have difficulty providing basic sanitation,
adequate medical care, education and appropriate diet for children. The
government does not support adoption homes or other children centers. According
to the March 2009 UN Report entitled, “Human Rights in Liberia’s
Orphanages”, children living in Liberia’s orphanages are denied basic
rights, ranging from the right to identity, family, leisure, education, adequate
sanitation and hygiene, health and participation in cultural activities. The
report concludes that the lack of these basic rights have an incremental and
lasting effect on the development of the Liberian Child.
In
another related report compiled by IRIN, malnutrition will kill 74,000 Liberian
Children by 2015, if nothing is done about the current situation of severe
hunger and health amongst children. The IRIN report also states that currently
in Liberia 37% of all children under 5 suffers from chronic malnutrition. With
these critical and vexing issues clawing at our national doorstep, with our
president tirelessly, persistently and frustratingly making every effort to
effectively deal with the UN millennium development Challenges, why then are
individuals like Deputy Minister Joseph Gebroo and his associate, Lydia Sherman
doing all they can to sabotage and hold hostage the president’s cardinal
effort to protect and dignify the Liberian child?
Where
is this new dispensation headed with the democratic election of Ellen Johnson
Sirleaf as president? One would have thought that this new dispensation was to
change the face of Liberian life as many ordinary Liberians have come to know it
for generations. Many Liberians truly believe that the election of Ellen
Johnson Sirleaf would evolve a democratically driven society where the
personification of integrity, honesty and a deep sense of purpose would be
achieved. Instead, certain close-minded individuals in this government have been
allowed to roam around Monrovia with nothing much to do but harass and torment
the lives of productive citizens trying to make a difference in the lives of
children.
Our
country will never change with this backward mindset. Will someone inform these
individuals that Inter-Country adoption is not an avenue to build individual
bank account? Inter-country adoption is a good thing for Liberia. It
exposes our children to resources and opportunities not currently available in
our country after 20 years of social devastation and economic dislocation. It
allows children to grow up as kids during their formative years.
J.
Eben Daygbor, can be reached at
ebendaygbor@yahoo.com
/Cell: 001.231.644.9267