Kosovo
Brief
Saturday,
March 15, 2008
By Ivan Simic
On 17 February
2008, in Southeastern Europe, the Serbian Southern
province
of Kosovo declared independence from the Republic of
Serbia, and self-proclaimed
a new Republic of Kosovo. The newly proclaimed
Republic of Kosovo was later
recognized by few sovereign states, but not by the UN.
Involvement of the
world's two (the EU and the US) out of five
superpowers in this event can be
explained through experimental theory, and as a secret
plan of the European
Union and the United States.
Experimental theory: Kosovo, an Ultimate Testing
Ground for 'Giants'
Things have changed in the international system, now
we have new
superpowers, superpowers that do not look like
anything we saw before.
Today, superpowers, states with leading positions in
the international
system and an ability to influence events and project
power on worldwide scales
are: the European Union, the United States, Russia,
China and India. These
superpowers sometimes need a testing ground to show
their superiority over
others. These days that testing ground is Kosovo.
The European Union
Looking at the current situation in Europe,
involvement of the EU can be
described through political and economical
perspectives. The European Union
as the most intelligent and the best organized
multiethnic Union ever seen
in human history, maybe wishes to become the world's
hegemon and independent
military force, independent from the US.
There are a few interesting facts concerning the EU
military. In relation to
the EU decisions and plans regarding the military and
military defense, it
is possible that the EU members want out of NATO, and
a new strong
independent army. NATO was not the European plan, the
Western European Union
(WEU) was. The WEU was signed by the Treaty of
Brussels in March 1949
between Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands
and the United Kingdom,
however, the US opposed the WEU and soon the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization in April
1949 (NATO) was established.
The Western European Union (WEU), was aimed primarily
at defending against possible German rearmament; NATO
on the other hand was established mainly to defend
against the Soviet Union and Eastern Block. Western
Europe at that time needed US support,
since it could not face the Soviet Union alone. The
true power of WEU was seen
in 1954 when West Germany and Italy joined. Today, the
Western European
Union has 10 member countries (UK, France, Belgium,
Luxembourg, the
Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Spain, Greece, and
Portugal), 6 associate
member countries, 5 observer countries and 7 associate
partner countries.
There are a number of multi-national military and
peacekeeping forces within
the EU, which are ultimately under the command of the
European Union. This future EU
army had few testing before its final completion, for
example through
NATO, EUFOR, EURFOR (SFOR, IFOR, and KFOR), Eurocorps,
among others.
According to The Helsinki Headline; 'Goal by the year
2010', the EU will have
full military capabilities in humanitarian and rescue
tasks, disarmament
operations, support to third world countries in
combating terrorism, peacekeeping
tasks and tasks of combat forces in crisis management,
and peacemaking. With
this new European army, the 21 EU Member States will
possibly suspend their
membership in NATO.
In theory, there are two possible scenarios of the EU
involvement in Kosovo
independence: political and economic, any other
theories of the EU honestly
supporting separatism (secessionism) are out of place.
Currently, 15 EU
countries-members are confronted with secessionism,
including Germany,
Spain, France, Italy, Belgium, Cyprus, Romania,
Slovakia, and the UK, among
others. Beside the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
whose dispute goes
back to 1983, long before the formation of the EU,
Kosovo is the new challenge
for the EU, especially because it is in Europe, and in
controllable
environment.
From the political side, the EU sees Kosovo's
unilateral declaration of
independence as an experiment. This experiment will
show to the EU where it
stands, what other superpowers think, how strong they
really are on the
international scene, and how they will behave after
Kosovo independence. The
EU will learn a lot about independence and will
prepare itself for any
possible secessions of any region within the EU. Also
this will be a great
opportunity to get more experience for the future army
through EULEX (The
European Union Rule of Law Mission) in Kosovo - the
mission will include 2000
police and judicial personnel, with the cost of 165
million Euros in the
first year.
From the economic side, Kosovo is very interesting to
two great EU members;
Germany and France. They are interested in
exploitation of the Kosovo
region, since Kosovo is geologically rich.
The United States of America
Many believe the US was putting pressure on the EU to
recognize independent
Kosovo. That is not true, the US was not in the
position, and she did not
want to. The US, like the EU does not support
secessionism. She and
neighboring Canada are also confronted with the same
problems among their
own states, for example California and Texas have
wanted to become
independent states, and Quebec in Canada.
From the political side, the US did not get anything
from Kosovo
independence, only additional foreign political
disputes. Kosovo was likely
to show that the US is still influential in the world,
and to test her power
on the international stage and within the UN. Maybe
after failure in Iraq,
Kosovo was supposed to help the US to divert
international political weight
from Iraq. Furthermore, the US efforts in making
Kosovo an independent state
did not change the image, which the Muslim and the
Arab world have over her.
From the strategic side, the US maybe wants to build a
new military base in
Kosovo. Today, she has a large military presence in
Europe, including
military bases in Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, the
UK, the Nederland,
among others, with around 100,000 military personnel.
The EU, especially
Germany, Italy (because of WWII and huge military
presence for decades), and
Russia will not allow the US to build additional
military bases in the Euro
region, and create quad points (the UK, Italy,
Germany, and Kosovo). If
European members of NATO suspend their membership and
decides that the US
should withdraw her military forces from Europe, the
US will be very
vulnerable. However, if the US in that moment looks
for an ally in the UK,
the UK, as the US biggest ally will turn back on her
and closely bond with
the EU.
Looking from the economic side, the United States will
only have additional
expenses over Kosovo. Kosovo, for many years is in
deficit, and there is not
much that the US can take from Kosovo which Europe
does not want.
There are speculations around the world and within EU
members over the
Kosovo issue. Questions have been asked: Why the EU
members have different
positions over this issue? Will Russia intervene and
use military force?
What will China do? What about India? Will this give
grounds to other
disputed areas to declare independence? These
questions and many others
provided reasonable grounds to look for the possible
secret plan of the EU
and the US.
The EU and the US secret plan: False Freedom
The European Union on 18 February 2008, officially
stated that it would 'take
note' of Kosovo's move, but leaves the question of
recognition to its member
states. It appears that the EU does not support Kosovo
independence, and
that some member states were lobbied by Albanians, and
in addition they
recognized independence (Germany, France, Italy, among
others), however,
some did not, nor will they recognize Kosovo. When the
EU and EU Member
States say that they are friends and wish to have good
diplomatic relations
with Serbia, they mean it, but that will be seen
later. So, according to
this, some Member States are in favor of supervised
independence, but not
for long.
It is a public secret that the Albanian lobby for
years created enormous
pressure on President Bush's administration, through
US politicians and
officials. As a result, they came to the only
acceptable solution; to
recognize and supervise Kosovo's independence in
cooperation with the EU, and get
the Albanian lobby off its back.
The
Republic of Serbia was an ally of Allies Forces in War
World II, on the other side Albania was the puppet
state of Fascist Italy, and Fascist Italy was the ally
of Nazi Germany. The US, by all means, has no
intention to spoil her relations with Serbia over
some European province-new Republic which she need to
support financially
over the next 20-30 years, when she have solid
relations and investments in
Serbia.
Despite all facts, the European Union and the United
States as influential
players in this event know that independent Kosovo
does not stand any chance
of survival; it cannot be a member of the EU, the UN,
OSCE, IOC, IMF, or any
other vital human organization. The EU and the US Law
enforcement
institutions are also familiar with Kosovo-Albanian
links with terrorist
organizations (Al Qaeda), paramilitary formations and
criminal
organizations. The EU, as a multi-ethnic Union
recognizes International
Law and the UN; however, this lobby had to be
satisfied.
In the next two years, Kosovo-Albanians will think
that they have succeeded
in their agenda, but they will realize they were
wrong. By mid 2010, when
the EU succeeds with The Helsinki Headline Goal, and
when a new US
administration takes firm control over the United
States, they will announce
that various reports have shown that unilaterally
declared Republic of
Kosovo under international supervision is not capable
of independence, and
that they are recommending that Kosovo, Albanians
continue to negotiate their
terms with the Republic of Serbia. Also, that a
Republic of Kosovo was a
mistake, and that Kosovo needs to be a part of Serbia.
This shows the world that secessionism is not easy as
many think,
and perhaps reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights
and International
Law, as well as the United Nations.
Both options are possible, and time will show if they
are true or not,
however, with the partial international recognition of
Kosovo independence,
for one more time, International Law and the Charter
of the United Nations
has been underrated.
Ivan Simic lives
in Belgrade, Serbia. Address: Paloticeva 12, 11000
Belgrade, Serbia, Tel: +381
63 7508500.