Home
Commentaries
Letters to the Editors
 
 
 
 
Archive
Mission Statement
Liberian Links
     
US Links
Other Int'l Links
 

 

 

Presidential gift rattles Press Union of Liberia? Give me a break

Monday, January 15, 2007            

    

 

 

   By Tewroh-Wehtoe Sungbeh

              

 

     The late former president Samuel Kanyon Doe, who was never fond of the Liberian politicians, denigrated them when they criticized him for his authoritarian rule.

     Mr. Doe was often heard saying how the bunch who considered themselves pro-democracy activists would wine and dine with him at night when the general public, the microphones and the cameras were absent, but found pleasure going after him during the day about human rights and democracy for the sake of publicity and to bash in their collective fifteen minutes of fame.

     Mr. Doe later revealed how he personally gave opposition politician Gabriel Baccus Matthews of the United People’s Party (UPP), Progressive Alliance of Liberia (PAL), or whatever, who was then a key critic of his predecessor and later a critic of Mr. Doe’s a vehicle to drive the opposition politician around.

     President Doe knew the politicians of his time were never serious about human rights and democracy in Liberia even though they pretended to be, and never had any ounce of respect for them because of their hypocritical nature but took the politicians for granted until he was violently ousted by those non-politicians during the civil crisis.

     President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf’s relationship with the Monrovia-based politicians has been one of convenience, a mutual relationship that relies heavily on the other scratching, looking out and watching the back of the other.

     And knowing how much skeletons they parties have in their respective closets, the other party dared not make the other angry; else, their dirty laundries would be washed thoroughly in public for all to know what really happened in the past and present.

     As a result of that mutual truce, corruption, which will eventually be the legacy of the Ellen Johnson Sirleaf administration looms in the press and in the government.

     President Sirleaf, who is still enjoying her political honeymoon reminds me of an endangered species that must be protected so as not to face extinction. As such

     it is rather preferable, as some would like it to be for the president’s critics to leave her alone because she's this special breed of human one cannot seriously engage. We have to be gentle with President Sirleaf so that she will also save a struggling nation on the brink of extinction.

     As a result of that fear the president can do whatever she wants to do, employ whomever she wants to employ even when the individual constantly violates the laws of the land as the people of Liberia continues to hear reports after reports of alleged corruption in the administration of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf without any relief in sight.

     Harry A. Greaves, who was recently cited by a UN panel of experts for underreporting $7m in oil revenues, and for awarding oil contract to a Nigerian company without ever going through the competitive bidding process is still employed as Managing Director of the Liberian Petroleum Refinery Corporation (LPRC), while selected former government officials are being cited for “economic sabotage.”

     President Sirleaf’s relationship with the Liberian press is not on the same level as it was with her predecessors in terms of intimidation; harassment, imprisonment and execution even though the president once referred to the press as “checkbook” journalists for the way some members go about doing their job.

     Despite the incendiary rhetoric from the president, the press has been allowed to freely operate under the Johnson-Sirleaf administration, while the Executive branch has been allowed to also do its job under the watchful eyes of a friendly press.

     However, President Sirleaf came under fire during the holidays when she offered as Christmas gift $500.00 each to media institutions in the country, which was meant to put them in the holiday spirit. That gesture did not sit well with the Press Union of Liberia who saw it as an attempt by the president to bribe its members.

     So what’s the difference this time, I wonder? Because in the past the president was allowed to visit and gave out cash to ailing members of the press and their families, and was also encouraged to gave money to a member of the press whose house was razed by a stubborn fire with the hypocritical endorsement of a pliant, complacent and gullible Press Union of Liberia who later issued a statement commending the president for her contributions.

     When I wrote in previous columns about the president’s habit of doling out money to the press and other institutions because such practice tend to corrupt the political process, renders the press ineffective and indebted to the president and other officials of government, a reader bluntly told me to “Leave the old ma alone.”

    “Liberia in truest, does not have an independent press,” journalist Moses D. Sandy noted in a recent column in The Liberian Dialogue but attributes its ethical lapses to poverty.

     I will agree with my colleague that Liberia does not have an independent press, but will respectfully disagree with him when poverty is used as an excuse for bad behavior.

    When grown men and women who supposed to uphold the integrity of their profession sell it to the highest bidder for money, they rob the citizens who depend on them for news and information, and can no longer be trusted to be the buffer between the people and branches of government.

     The press in Liberia is like a lap dog answerable to its owners and those that can afford to pay for its services, but barks selectively only when it feels like it while corruption is running amok in that country.

     The Press Union of Liberia (PUL), cannot pick and choose which behavior it wants to conveniently criticize, yet is comfortable with incompetence and corruption, especially when its countless members and news organizations cannot cover a story in Liberia or publish an article from abroad unless they are paid financially.

     I am anxiously anticipating the day the Press Union of Liberia will clamp down on money changing hands between the President of Liberia, government officials, the public and its members.

     Let there be loud noise made for all financial transactions and presents given to the press, and not only for the ones given by a president in the name of Christmas.

    

    

    

    

 

             

    

 

    

     

    

 

    

     

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

  

      

    

 

 

 

 

  

   

   

     

    

    

 

     

     

 

Home |  About Theliberiandialogue |  Contact Us
© 2002 Sungbeh Communications. All Rights Reserved