|
Geraldine-Doe
Sheriff Won, But the Obvious
Lack of Political Maturity and
Substance Could Be George Weah
and CDC's Achilles Heels in
2011
Of Two Soccer Legends
Tuesday,
January 12, 2010
 |
|
Tewroh-Wehtoe
Sungbeh
|
Geraldine-Doe
Sheriff is now Senator-elect
or (soon-to-be) Senator
Geraldine-Doe Sheriff of
Montserrado County. Prior to
her flirtation with the
Montserrado County senatorial
seat, most Liberians heard of
this lady when she ran for the
presidency of the Oilers
Sports Association, then later
when she ran for the national
chairmanship of the Congress
for Democratic Change
political party; but did not
know whether she had any
future political aspirations
for a national senatorial
seat.
It was during her run
for the national chairmanship
of the Congress for Democratic
Change political party in
2008, we saw or heard about
the virulent infighting
between her die-hard
supporters and those of her
strongest challenger, Joshua
Sackie, at which time the
famous “First Partisan”
and “Ambassador” George
Manneh Weah was conspicuously
missing in action for a long
period amid the embarrassing
public feud in the political
party he founded to aid his
run for the presidency in
2005. This is the same
political party he’s
cleverly hiding behind once
again to guide his second bid
for the presidency in 2011.
In
the wake of the public feud in
the ranks of the Congress for
Democratic Change (CDC) in
Monrovia, deputy secretary
general Acarius Gray showed
his own political naivete when
he reportedly said the CDC
would disrupt the upcoming
2011 presidential and general
elections unless a
non-partisan is brought
onboard to oversee the
upcoming elections, which certainly is not the way to
run a national political party
that wants to be seen as a
serious alternative to the
current leadership in Liberia.

Senator-elect
Geraldine-Doe
Sheriff
Amb. George Weah
“Unless a non-partisan is
brought on onboard, the party
will create an ugly situation
that will disrupt the 2011
elections,” Gray said.
According to Star Radio and
other major news web sites,
the Congress for Democratic
Change even called for the
dissolution of the National
Elections Commission (NEC)
before the 2011 elections.
The mind boggling
threats and political
immaturity of the Congress for
Democratic Change (CDC) took
another turn during the recent
Montserrado County senatorial
election when George Weah, who
wants to be the next president
of Liberia reportedly
threatened “severe
consequences” if his party
looses the Montserrado County
senatorial by-election.
Even
though Weah’s mangled
utterances are simplistic and
not resembling the thoughtful
words of a serious
presidential candidate, they
are clear enough for one to
know he is threatening
violence and intimidation to
cruise his way to electoral
victory.
“Liberia’s
democracy could be plunged
into trouble if the election
is not free, fair and
transparent. The seat belongs
to CDC and UP want to take it
from us, but we will win it
back. So we want the NEC to
play fair so we all can live
in peace,” George Weah
reportedly said.
Where
are the Liberian National
Police and the Attorney
General of Liberia when we
need them?
How
in the world can George Weah
make such threat in the wake
of a fragile peace the
citizens of Liberia are now
enjoying after a prolonged and
senseless civil war without
him being arrested,
investigated, and put on trial
for inciting violence, and
undermining the national
security of the nation during
these fragile times? How can
this man who wants to lead an
entire people and nation
naively say the senatorial
seat belongs to him and his
political party? How silly can
he be? Who is Weah’s
political advisor, anyway?
Like
the criminal, Charles Taylor,
who threatened to keep on
fighting for the next 50 years
if he didn't win the
presidency, but won it anyway,
because the Liberian people
were fearful of a protracted
civil war, George Weah
continues to talk tough and
threatening the Liberian
people who are adhering to the
rule of law, trying to get
back on their feet, and
minding their own business
since the war came to an end. A
behavior of this kind shows
Weah is still a child, and the
Liberian people will pay a
heavy price if George Manneh
Weah is ever elected president
of that country.
However,
the enthusiasm generated by
the November 24, by-election,
which had a record turnout
than the previous one of
November 10, was an impressive
one that should get the
attention of political
observers, because it brought
out Liberians who wanted to
make a difference in their
country’s future in an
unprecedented way.
Not
wanting to gave the Unity
Party and President Sirleaf
another victory and a blank
check that could gave her even
more imperial power than she
already has in her possession,
the Liberian people went to
the polls and made a
difference even after
President Sirleaf gave her
unconditional support to
institutional candidate
Clemenceau Urey, which did not
go well with most Liberians
who saw the president and her
party’s involvement in the
race as an arrogant way to grab more
power.
The
president’s overbearing and
shameless involvement in the
senatorial race made
Geraldine-Doe Sheriff the
underdog, made most Liberians
nervous; made it much harder
for candidate Doe-Sheriff to
be heard since some of us
never got to know where she
stands on the issues, and also
made it much harder for her to
contrast herself from the
other candidates who vied for
the singular position.
Even
though the trailblazing
accomplishment of
Geraldine-Doe Sheriff is an
impressive feat that should be
applauded, most Liberians
still don’t know
senator-elect Geraldine-Doe
Sheriff’s position on the
crippling issues that plagued
the nation, and hopes that she
will find the time after her
victory celebration dies down
to meet Liberians and discuss
practical and sensible ways to
help solve some of the
nation’s nagging problems.
The
Liberian people will never
know Geraldine-Doe Sheriff’s
political agenda when her
highly publicized scheduled
appearance slated for the U.S.
(Washington, DC), was abruptly
cancelled because of her very
“tight schedule” an e-mail
noted, as if the Senator-elect
or her handlers are unaware of
the fact that the Senate is a
very hectic environment where
tough schedules are part of
the culture. And in order to
meet one’s constituents, an
elected lawmaker has to juggle
and work around backbreaking
schedules to answer questions
in order to ease the anxieties
of his or her constituencies.
Geraldine-Doe Sheriff and her
handlers should have known
that she
had a very “tight
schedule” before notifying
Liberians in the United States
that she was going to meet
with them once she was in the
United States.
Meanwhile,
an e-mail I found in my inbox
written and signed on January
11, 2010, by CDC-PA Chairman
Alfred Jardiah acknowledged
that a Palava Hut Forum was
held in Philadelphia, but
vaguely claimed (she)
Geraldine-Doe Sheriff
“displayed such great
political performance, at the
program,” and also vaguely
said: “Ambassador George
Weah gave a very inspiring
speech; during the question
and answer session, he offered
his vision for Liberia and
what he would do to improve
the living conditions of
ordinary people. Ambassador
Weah also used that occasion
to dispel myths concerning his
education and understanding
about the workings of
government,” Jardiah wrote.
I wonder what performance
Jardiah is talking about, and
is it possible for Jardiah to
spell out Weah’s vision, and
how he (Weah) is going to
improve the living conditions
of ordinary Liberians? I
really want to know.
However,
a January 6, 2010, e-mail
below from the party’s
US-based National Chairman,
Matthew N. Nimpson explained
the reasons for the
senator-elect’s cancellation
of her meeting with Liberians
in the United States.
“Please
accept our sincere apology for
the inability of Mrs.
Geraldine Doe-Sheriff,
Senator-Elect of Montserrado
County, to visit the
Washington, D.C. Metropolitan
for the town hall style
meeting with the Liberian
community in the area which
was earlier announced by us.
This is due to her very tight
schedule and the urgency that
she returns to Liberia as soon
as possible for the return of
the Liberian Legislative
Branch back to session from
their holidays. Mrs. Sheriff
will be taking her oath of
office then as the new junior
senator from Montserado
County, R.L. replacing the
late Honorable Hannah G. Brent
of the CDC Party,” Nimpson
wrote.
Geraldine-Doe
Sheriff did not win the
senatorial race because of her
political acumen or
popularity, or because of
George Weah’s own political
acumen. She did not run a
campaign that contrasted her
“ideas” from that of her
challengers, nor did she win
because she was the most
qualified candidate among the
bunch that contested the seat
vacated by the death of
Senator Hannah G. Brent.
Doe-Sheriff
piggybacked on Weah’s
celebrity due to his
history-making stint as a
former star footballer, and a
football-crazed nation still
romanticizing Weah’s
prodigious feat on the
football field seemed to
confuse his football handling
skills with political
leadership, which sadly, are
not quite the same.
The senator-elect’s
inability to get 50%+1 of the
votes on November 10, which
would have avoided a runoff
led to the November 24,
Montserrado County
by-election-runoff between
Doe-Sheriff and Urey, which
leads me to believe Weah is
politically vulnerable even as
some political observers
continued to see the recent UP/CDC match
up at the polls as a preview
to the 2011 general and
presidential elections between
Weah and President Ellen Johnson
Sirleaf.
The
electoral numbers 56%/44% for
Doe-Sheriff and Urey -
out of 105,800 total
votes, certainly exposed the
vulnerabilities of George Weah,
and shows he can be defeated
if a solid candidate enters
the race with a message that
resonates with the electorates
– message such as a
development agenda, compassion
and a vision to create jobs
and sustainable wages,
healthcare and education,
curbing corruption and crimes,
and a vision to implement
bread and butter programs that
puts food on the table.
During
his first fun for president,
Weah did not come close to
telling the Liberian people
what he would do once he’s
elected, and since hasn’t
come close to articulating his
vision and agenda; and his CDC
political party, as usual, did
not run a campaign of ideals
either, but dwelled on
threats, whining, and blame
games to make their political
points. Behavior of this kind
is not only politically fatal,
it puts the Congress for
Democratic Change and George
Weah in the same boat
with Charles Taylor, who
relied on threats,
intimidation, and savagery to
win the presidency.
|